<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Razor Consulting, Inc.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://razor-consulting.net/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://razor-consulting.net</link>
	<description>Securing your world, &#34;bit by bit--byte by byte.&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:42:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Vulnerability</title>
		<link>http://razor-consulting.net/?p=196</link>
		<comments>http://razor-consulting.net/?p=196#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advisories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CVE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malicious Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Novell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outlook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pen-Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RPC Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Routers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razor-consulting.net/?p=196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Wednesday July 28th, Microsoft contacted MAPPs partners, of which Razor Consulting, Inc is a member, to inform us of a new vulnerability in the parsing of .lnk files, known as Windows Shortcut Files. Symantec coders were on top of it on the 16th.The vulnerability lies in Windows Shell, which is responsible for parsing the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Wednesday July 28th, Microsoft contacted MAPPs partners, of which Razor Consulting, Inc is a member, to inform us of a new vulnerability in the parsing of .lnk files, known as Windows Shortcut Files. Symantec coders were on top of it on the 16th.<span id="more-196"></span>The vulnerability lies in Windows Shell, which is responsible for parsing the files and could lead to an attacker executing arbitrary code on a victim machine whenever the .lnk file is viewed with an application such as Windows Explorer. This attack vector can be exploited via USB drives, network shares or WebDAV. As of now, Microsoft has released only workarounds for this issue, a patch is not presently available.<br /> &nbsp;<br /> Microsoft has finally gone public with this information, despite not yet having a patch available, as the vulnerability is presently being exploited by the Stuxnet worm. This worm is specifically targeting Siemens&rsquo; SCADA (Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition) software.</p>
<p> There are a number of components to this malware that are interesting.&nbsp; The malware includes rootkit drivers that were digitally signed using valid certificates from Taiwanese chip manufacturing companies, RealTek and JMicron.&nbsp; It is currently believed that these certificates were stolen and the certificates have since been revoked.&nbsp; The kernel mode rootkit includes functionality to hide the files used in the attack on the system and to load a dynamic library file (DLL) that contains a number of other files and functionalities.&nbsp; Complete analysis of the inner workings of all of the files is on-going.</p>
<p>This is a serious threat to all Windows users, the malware checks the infected system to see if it is running Siemens Simatic WinCC or PCS7 products.&nbsp; If the infected system is running either of these products, the malware automatically uses a default password that is hard-coded into the software.&nbsp; Once the malware has access to the control system software, it issues SQL queries against the Microsoft SQL database to gain access to the industrial designs the system is responsible for.&nbsp; Siemens has information on their support site3 about the impact to their software.&nbsp; In other words, it appears that the primary function of the malware is to gain access to and steal industrial and control system designs.&nbsp; The perpetrators behind the malware are not currently (publicly) known.&nbsp; However, over 90% of the impacted systems have been isolated to three countries: India, Indonesia, and Iran4 .&nbsp; It is possible that these countries were specifically targeted by the malware. After careful data mining it is my observation that Automatic Updates should be turned off on XPSP3-Vista- and Windows 7. <a href="mailto:info@razor-consulting.net" target="_blank" title="Contact Newsletter"><strong>Email me</strong></a> here for the monthly newsletter, or check out the <a href="http://razor-consulting.net/?feed=rss2" target="_blank" title="Razor Consulting, Inc RSS Feed">RSS Feed here</a>. This site is mobile phone compatible. </p>
<p align="center"><strong>Show me a a design error and I&#39;ll show you a hole.</strong></p>
<p align="center">-RF </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://razor-consulting.net/?feed=rss2&amp;p=196</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Passwords and Beyond</title>
		<link>http://razor-consulting.net/?p=192</link>
		<comments>http://razor-consulting.net/?p=192#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razor-consulting.net/?p=192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In most organizations, the only method of authentication by which users identify themselves to computer systems is the password. The concept of passwords has been around for decades and, while not perfect, it&#8217;s cheap to establish and easy to support. To gain maximum security you need a company-wide password strategy. In practice this will be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="section">
<p class="first-para"><span class="bold">In most organizations, the only method of  authentication by</span> <span class="bold">which users identify themselves to computer  systems is the</span> <span class="bold">password. The concept of passwords has been  around for decades</span> <span class="bold">and, while not perfect, it&rsquo;s cheap to  establish and easy to support.</span><span id="more-192"></span></p>
<p class="para">To gain maximum security you need a company-wide password  strategy. In practice this will be a mix of management, education and  technology. Management and education techniques can be used to stress the  importance of having a sensible password policy, and technology can be used to  enforce it. Windows 2000 and XP, for example, have a Local Password Policy  setting, which allows you to specify how often a user must change their  password, the minimum length for the password, whether the password must be  forced to meet complexity requirements, and how many previous passwords the  system will remember to prevent users recycling them from a list rather than  thinking of new ones each time. More details <a name="66" title="66"></a><a name="IDX-3478DBC8F2-2B51-4A11-BE8D-E4C9093DB29B" title="IDX-3478DBC8F2-2B51-4A11-BE8D-E4C9093DB29B"></a>are in <a target="_parent">Chapter 9</a>. If you select the option that requires passwords  to meet complexity requirements, this causes Windows to ensure that a password  selected by a user:</p>
<ol class="orderedlist">
<li class="first-listitem">
<p class="first-para">Is at least six characters long.</p>
</li>
<li class="listitem">
<p class="first-para">Contains characters from at least three of the following  categories:</p>
<ul class="itemizedlist">
<li class="first-listitem">
<p class="first-para">English uppercase characters A&ndash;Z</p>
</li>
<li class="listitem">
<p class="first-para">English lowercase characters (a&ndash;z)</p>
</li>
<li class="listitem">
<p class="first-para">Digits 0&ndash;9</p>
</li>
<li class="listitem">
<p class="first-para">Non-alphanumeric characters such as $, #, or %</p>
</li>
<li class="listitem">
<p class="first-para">Unicode characters</p>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li class="listitem">
<p class="first-para">Does not contain three or more consecutive characters from  the user&rsquo;s account name.</p>
</li>
</ol>
<p class="para">Whether to enforce complexity, and how often you should force  users to change their passwords, is a complex decision. While frequent changes  and complex passwords would at first glance appear to be more secure than  passwords which rarely change and are easier to remember, human nature means  that reality is quite different from the theory. The biggest problem with  passwords is that users forget them. This causes difficulties for companies that  rely on them, because technical support staff spend most of their time resetting  forgotten passwords rather than helping people with real problems or doing  long-term work to improve the system. The more complex a password, and the more  often it changes, the more often it will be forgotten, and the more often it  will be written down by users who are frightened of forgetting them. Beware,  therefore, of making your password policy so complicated that you actually  weaken security, because a password that&rsquo;s written down isn&rsquo;t really providing  you with any security at all.</p>
<p class="para">If you don&rsquo;t currently have a policy for dealing with people who  claim to have forgotten their password, then this should be defined as part of  your password policy. A common technique used by hackers, especially those  well-versed in the art of social engineering (which we&rsquo;ll cover in <a target="_parent">Chapter 34</a>), is to pass themselves off as a  member of your staff who claims to have forgotten their password. So, your  policy needs to ensure that:</p>
<ol class="orderedlist">
<li class="first-listitem">
<p class="first-para">Only a handful of duly authorized people are able to reset  passwords.</p>
<p> <a name="67" title="67"></a><a name="IDX-3578DBC8F2-2B51-4A11-BE8D-E4C9093DB29B" title="IDX-3578DBC8F2-2B51-4A11-BE8D-E4C9093DB29B"></a></li>
<li class="listitem">
<p class="first-para">A user is only ever advised of a reset password in writing  to the address that you have on file, or in person. Never over the  telephone.</p>
</li>
<li class="listitem">
<p class="first-para">A user who is given a new password in person must produce  some form of identification if they are not known to the person who is handing  out the password.</p>
</li>
<li class="listitem">
<p class="first-para">Someone who forgets their password is not criticized or  penalized, or they&rsquo;ll start writing it down so as to prevent it happening  again.</p>
</li>
<li class="listitem">
<p class="first-para">Administrator passwords should only ever be used when their  additional functionality is required. At all other times, administrators should  use their standard user-level passwords. This helps to avoid data loss caused by  mistakes that would otherwise have been prevented, and reduces the amount of  time available to a hacker who might be trying to intercept or otherwise  discover the administrator&rsquo;s password.</p>
</li>
<li class="listitem">
<p class="first-para">Employees must never be allowed to use each others&rsquo;  passwords, even if both employees are afforded the same access privileges,  because it is imperative that your log files can be relied upon to provide an  accurate record of which actions have been taken by which person.</p>
</li>
<li class="listitem">
<p class="first-para">Ensure that passwords are not duplicated across systems.  It&rsquo;s common for administrators to set themselves up with the same password on  every machine they look after &ndash; this should be discouraged.</p>
</li>
<li class="listitem">
<p class="first-para">Change administrator passwords frequently. If an  administrator leaves the company, all of the passwords to which he or she had  access must be changed within an hour.</p>
</li>
<li class="listitem">
<p class="first-para">There must be no exceptions to these rules,  ever.</p>
</li>
</ol></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://razor-consulting.net/?feed=rss2&amp;p=192</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Securing your Medical Practice  and Avoiding Law Suits</title>
		<link>http://razor-consulting.net/?p=190</link>
		<comments>http://razor-consulting.net/?p=190#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 05:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razor-consulting.net/?p=190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most people assume that the typical cracker rarely ventures onto the premises of the company whose systems he wishes to attack. He prefers instead the anonymity of the internet and the freedom that it gives him to attack targets all over the world regardless of time zones. Consequently, most companies put all their IT security [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most people assume that the typical cracker rarely ventures onto the premises of the company whose systems he wishes to attack. He prefers instead the anonymity of the internet and the freedom that it gives him to attack targets all over the world regardless of time zones. Consequently, most companies put all their IT security effort into protecting their servers from internet-based attack and fail to give adequate consideration to the activities that a cracker could carry out in person. Such neglect is at best unwise and at worst highly dangerous. <span id="more-190"></span>Most people assume that the typical hacker rarely ventures onto the premises of the company whose systems he wishes to attack. He prefers instead the anonymity of the internet and the freedom that it gives him to attack targets all over the world regardless of time zones. Consequently, most companies put all their IT security effort into protecting their servers from internet-based attack and fail to give adequate consideration to the activities that a hacker could carry out in person. Such neglect is at best unwise and at worst highly dangerous.</p>
<p> A talented and certified security oficial understands that there is no such thing as the typical cracker. Sure, most of them operate via the internet at weird hours of the night and don&rsquo;t have the social skills to inveigle their way into buildings. But not all crackers fit the typical mould. While the curious student might not wish to attempt to enter your building, someone who&rsquo;s carrying out some industrial espionage on behalf of your competitors just might. And modern technology means that the unwelcome visitor needs just a couple of minutes alone in an unmonitored part of your building to do what he has to do.</p>
<p> Unauthorized Actions<br /> Once the intruder has entered your building, he has a number of options at his disposal. If he can find his way into an empty meeting room and find a spare network socket, he might plug a wireless access point into it. He can then continue to probe and attack your network at his leisure from anywhere within a few hundred feet. If he manages to gain access to an employee&rsquo;s PC, he might install a keystroke logger that he can then interrogate remotely via email in order to read private correspondence or steal passwords.</p>
<p> If he has a USB flash drive, he might use some social engineering skills to copy information from a PC onto the drive. Such as posing as an IT technician who needs to install an updated network driver on the PC to cope with a forthcoming system upgrade, and he just happens to have a copy of the driver on his flash drive.</p>
<p> Remember that all MP3 music players, Externals, Cameras, IPODS, Network Printers can also be used as portable disk drives, to which can be copied any type of data file. A visitor who asks permission to plug his mobile phone into the USB port of one of your PCs in order to charge a flat battery might actually be running a program that silently copies documents to the phone&rsquo;s memory. Programs to do this are widely available on the internet, including one for the iPod called &lsquo;Slurp&rsquo;. Install the software on your iPod music player, plug it into any handy PC, and no one is aware that you are not listening to music but that you are simply watching the device grab copies of all the files on the computer.</p>
<p> If the cracker can&rsquo;t find a handy PC or network socket, all is not lost. The paperless office was first mooted many decades ago but has failed to materialize, so hackers can be fairly confident that they will find a plethora of printouts lying around, some of which might be of particular interest. Most mobile phones and PDAs nowadays include megapixel cameras that are quite capable of producing a readable image of a printed sheet of paper. Waste bins are a particularly good source of interesting printouts, and sheets that have been torn in half are always bound to contain particularly interesting data (go on, admit it, you do that too).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://razor-consulting.net/?feed=rss2&amp;p=190</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why bother with penetration testing?</title>
		<link>http://razor-consulting.net/?p=188</link>
		<comments>http://razor-consulting.net/?p=188#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 04:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razor-consulting.net/?p=188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s only one way to discover the true state of your company&#8217;s IT security, and that&#8217;s to try breaking it. It&#8217;s possible to do this yourself using automated software products which try to mimic the behaviour of a typical hacker, and such products will be discussed later in this chapter. But the best way to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&rsquo;s only one way to discover the true state of your company&rsquo;s IT security, and that&rsquo;s to try breaking it. It&rsquo;s possible to do this yourself using automated software products which try to mimic the behaviour of a typical hacker, and such products will be discussed later in this chapter. But the best way to discover the full truth about the state of your security is to undergo a penetration test by a licensed and bonded security professional.<span id="more-188"></span></p>
<p> On the face of it, penetration testing is a fairly simple process. You employ a firm of security consultants to hack into your network using whatever means they wish. This is done on the understanding that the testers don&rsquo;t damage anything, don&rsquo;t divulge what they discover to any third parties, and they produce a report for you that identifies the holes in your security and explains how to plug them. A contract is always required for this test.</p>
<p> Almost all large organizations in both the private and public sector undergo penetration tests on a regular basis (typically once every year or two). The event offers an unparalleled opportunity for the organization to find out the true state of its IT security. But the whole exercise is not without its problems, most notably regarding cost and trust.</p>
<p> Employing a penetration testing company (sometimes known as a Razor Slice) is not cheap. Even the smallest company, expect to pay a few thousand dollars. But it&rsquo;s always money well spent because it results either in reassurance and peace of mind, or huge relief that the main loopholes in your security have been discovered by good guys, and that you can fix them before it&rsquo;s too late.</p>
<p> Finding a reputable penetration testing company is difficult. Some companies specialize in the practice, or at least are specialist security consultants. Others are more general management consultancies or even accountants, who have realized that there&rsquo;s money in IT security and have recruited some techies. Of those who actually carry out the testing, many are ex-hackers who learned their skills on the job, while some are much more academic and have honed their talents by reading textbooks and practicing on their own test networks in computer labs. All of which leads to a dilemma. Do you choose ex-hackers, who will do a good job but might not be trustworthy? Or do you choose accountants, who are probably trustworthy but possibly not as skilled?</p>
<p> I suggest that you choose the specialist security consultancies rather than the opportunist accountants. Don&rsquo;t worry about them using ex-hackers, so long as they are well-managed. Most importantly, get personal recommendations from colleagues and counterparts. Next time you&rsquo;re invited to a sales seminar by a security company, take the opportunity to go along, even if you&rsquo;re not particularly interested in the products being marketed. Such events are a great way to meet fellow delegates who have similar problems to yours, and an informal chat with such people over lunch or coffee will yield more useful information than reading a thousand white papers and brochures on the Web.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://razor-consulting.net/?feed=rss2&amp;p=188</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Security Through Obscurity</title>
		<link>http://razor-consulting.net/?p=181</link>
		<comments>http://razor-consulting.net/?p=181#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razor-consulting.net/?p=181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Defeating crackers requires many different techniques. You can use encryption to protect confidential files, or user names and passwords to guard a private Web site. To prevent unauthorized copying of document files you can use digital rights management, and to block access to your servers you can install a firewall. But whatever security product, system [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Defeating crackers requires many different techniques. You can use encryption to protect confidential files, or user names and passwords to guard a private Web site. <span id="more-181"></span>To prevent unauthorized copying of document files you can use digital rights management, and to block access to your servers you can install a firewall. But whatever security product, system or service you use, there&rsquo;s always one thing that never changes: the security precautions that you have taken are overt and visible, and the cracker will be aware of them.</p>
<p> Providing potential crackers with clear evidence of your security systems makes good sense and is a useful deterrent. But there&rsquo;s also another option, known as Security Through Obscurity (STO), which takes a completely different approach. In STO, the mere existence of the protected system is the secret and so there is no need to provide any additional security.</p>
<p> A good example of STO is that of leaving a spare door key under the mat or inside a flower pot. There&rsquo;s no need to protect the key any further, because no one except the owner (and anyone who has been told of its existence by the owner) will know that it&rsquo;s there. Another example that appears regularly in fiction is the secret doorway disguised as a bookcase. Pull on a particular &lsquo;book&rsquo; in a certain way and the shelves magically revolve to reveal a hidden passage. The door is never locked. It doesn&rsquo;t need to be, because no one knows it exists.</p>
<p> Security Through Obscurity is often used to protect information systems. For example, a company&rsquo;s Web site that provides information for the public might also contain some private pages for employees only. Yet instead of adding password protection to the staff-only pages, they are simply hidden behind an obscure URL. I even know of Web sites that use similar techniques to hide not just private information, but also the editing facilities &ndash; anyone who knows the secret URL can change the content of the site.</p>
<p> Security Through Obscurity is a much-used technique because it&rsquo;s quick and easy. Implementing this form of security means not having to implement any security at all, and simply hoping that the crackers won&rsquo;t discover your secret. The fundamental problem with this approach is twofold: first, there&rsquo;s a chance that the crackers will discover your secret. Secondly, and much more important, you won&rsquo;t realize that your secret is out until it&rsquo;s too late. Until the content of your Web site changes, or someone breaks into your house, or someone finds your secret passage.</p>
<p> There are plenty of tools available to help crackers defeat STO security, the best-known of which is the humble search engine. By entering the correct incantation into Google, for example, the hacker can find URLs that include a folder called admin. He then surfs to that directory in the hope of being presented with an admin menu and not being asked for a password.</p>
<p> One further example of STO is the Caesar Cipher, a primitive form of encryption dating from 2000 years ago in which each letter of the plaintext is substituted with a letter that is three positions later in the alphabet. A becomes D, B becomes E and so on, and thus computer becomes frpsxwhu. At first glance, the code appears uncrackable, but a little investigation and experimentation will uncover the secret and then open up all the information that has ever been protected using this method.</p>
<p> Compare this with a conventional modern-day encryption algorithm which depends on highly complex mathematical formulas which would take many years for even the most powerful computer to solve. Everyone knows the secret but they simply don&rsquo;t have the resources to solve it. Back in the real world, this is like leaving your spare key under the mat of a house a couple of miles away. Anyone who finds it will know what it is, but trying to discover which house it fits is simply not practical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://razor-consulting.net/?feed=rss2&amp;p=181</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your Information Security Policy</title>
		<link>http://razor-consulting.net/?p=179</link>
		<comments>http://razor-consulting.net/?p=179#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razor-consulting.net/?p=179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every company needs a formal written document which spells out to staff precisely what they are allowed to use the company&#8217;s systems for, what is prohibited, and what will happen to them if they break the rules. This document goes under various names but is most often known as an information security policy or an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every company needs a formal written document which spells out to staff precisely what they are allowed to use the company&rsquo;s systems for, what is prohibited, and what will happen to them if they break the rules.<span id="more-179"></span> This document goes under various names but is most often known as an information security policy or an AUP (acceptable use policy).</p>
<p> Two printed copies of the policy should be given to every staff member as soon as possible after they join the organization (ideally on day one). The staff member should be asked to sign one copy, which should be safely filed by the company, and keep the other for their records. No one should be allowed to use the company&rsquo;s computer systems until they have signed the policy in acceptance of its terms.</p>
<p> A written policy, and a requirement that all staff sign it, may at first appear rather draconian, which is probably why many small and medium companies tend not to have one. But such a document really is a central component of any successful campaign to increase medical office security.</p>
<p> Without a written policy, staff will be unaware of the rules. How can you discipline someone for inappropriate use of the Web unless everyone is in agreement as to what constitutes inappropriate use? Equally, staff need to be made aware that activities such as sharing passwords are dangerous and that they face disciplinary action if they do it. By putting their name to a written document, the rules are clear and unambiguous to all.</p>
<p> If you don&rsquo;t currently have a policy, you should draft one as a matter of urgency. If you have one but it&rsquo;s not been revised for some time, now might be a good time to retrieve it and ensure that it is up to date. For example, does it cover the use of technology such as USB flash drives or copying MP3 files from company computers to personal players?</p>
<p> It is not normally necessary for staff to sign a new copy of the policy each time a minor amendment is made. The policy should contain a clause that ensures that staff are aware that there may be a more recent version of the document on the internal Web site and that this will take priority. You may also wish to send out a bulk email to all staff each time the document is updated, which highlights the amendments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://razor-consulting.net/?feed=rss2&amp;p=179</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cookies Defined</title>
		<link>http://razor-consulting.net/?p=176</link>
		<comments>http://razor-consulting.net/?p=176#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 11:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razor-consulting.net/?p=176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[here are two types of computer cookies: temporary and permanent. Temporary cookies, also called session cookies, are stored temporarily in your browser&#39;s memory and are deleted as soon as you end the session by closing the browser. Permanent cookies, also called persistent cookies, are stored permanently on your computer&#39;s hard drive and, if deleted, will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>here are two types of computer cookies: temporary and permanent. Temporary cookies, also called session cookies, are stored temporarily in your browser&#39;s memory and are deleted as soon as you end the session by closing the browser. <span id="more-176"></span>Permanent cookies, also called persistent cookies, are stored permanently on your computer&#39;s hard drive and, if deleted, will be recreated the next time you visit the sites that placed them there.Cookie technology addressed the need to keep track of information entered at a site so that if you submitted a registration form for example, the site could associate that information with you as you traveled through the site&#39;s pages. Otherwise, every time you clicked on a different page in the site, establishing a new connection, the site would lose the information in reference to you, forcing you to re-enter it.<br /> A temporary cookie solved this problem in the short term by setting aside a little bit of browser memory to save information. However, once the browser was closed, all temporary cookies were lost. Return surfers were not recognized and registration information had to be re-supplied at every visit.</p>
<p> Persistent cookies solved this problem. They allowed a site to recognize a surfer permanently by transferring a text file with a unique ID tag to the visitor&#39;s hard drive, matching a file on the server. On subsequent visits, the browser automatically handed this cookie over, allowing the site to pull up their matching cookie. Now cookies could persist for years.Both temporary and permanent computer cookies can be used for many helpful purposes. Automatic registration logon, preserving website preferences, and saving items to a shopping cart are all examples of cookies put to good use. But permanent cookies also resulted in unanticipated uses, such as Web profiling.Websites began keeping track of the surfing habits of its visitors, using computer cookies to log when an individual visited, what pages were viewed, and how long the visitor stayed. If he or she returned at a later date, the visitor&rsquo;s cookie triggered opens the log of previous visits and was amended to include the new visit. If personal information was offered on any of these visits, name, address and other information was associated with the &quot;anonymous&quot; ID tag, and consequently, the entire profile.Marketers developed an even greater advantage for cookie profiling. Having advertising rights on several hundred and even many thousands of the most popular websites, marketers could pass third-party cookies to surfers and subsequently recognize individuals as they traveled across the Web, from site to site, logging comprehensive profiles of people&#39;s surfing habits over a period of months and even years. Sophisticated profiling programs quickly sort information provided by computer cookies, categorizing targets in several different areas based on statistical data. Gender, race, age, income level, political leanings, religious affiliation, physical location, marital status, children, pets and even sexual orientation can all be determined with varying degrees of accuracy through cookie profiling. Much depends on how much a person surfs, and where he or she chooses to go online.</p>
<p> As a result of public outcry in response to surreptitious profiling, cookie controls were placed in post 3.x browsers to allow users to turn cookies off &mdash; options that were not available in 1995 when permanent cookie technology was first embedded into browsers without public awareness or knowledge of how they could be used. Cookie controls also allow user-created lists for exceptions, so that one can turn cookies off, for example, but exempt sites where computer cookies are put to a useful purpose. Third-party cookies often have their own controls, as they are normally tracking cookies placed by marketers. Cookie contents are encrypted and are only readable by the site that placed them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://razor-consulting.net/?feed=rss2&amp;p=176</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to back up favorites in IE 8</title>
		<link>http://razor-consulting.net/?p=159</link>
		<comments>http://razor-consulting.net/?p=159#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razor-consulting.net/?p=159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you must use Internet Explorer, this is how you back up your favorites &#124;Version 8&#124; Instructions Step 1-&#62; On the right hand side of the browser look for the word &#34;Tools.&#34; Click on the arrow on the right hand side of &#34;Tools.&#34; Step 2-&#62; Scrolls down to &#34;Toolbars&#34; and verify that &#34;Menu Bar&#34; has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Heading3a">If you <em><strong>must</strong></em> use Internet Explorer, this is how you back up your favorites |Version 8|<span id="more-159"></span></p></div>
<div class="Heading3a">Instructions</div>
<p> <!-- google_ad_section_start() -->
<ol>
<li>
<div class="stepBg">Step <span>1</span>-&gt; On the right hand side of the browser  look for the word &quot;Tools.&quot;  Click on the arrow on the right hand side of  &quot;Tools.&quot;</p>
<p> </div>
</li>
<li>
<div class="stepBg">Step <span>2</span>-&gt; Scrolls down to &quot;Toolbars&quot; and verify that &quot;Menu Bar&quot; has a  check mark.  If not, simple click on &quot;Menu Bar.&quot;</p>
<p> </div>
</li>
<li>
<div class="stepBg">Step <span>3-&gt;</span> You will now see the menu bar right on the upper left hand  side.  Click on &quot;File&quot; and scroll down to &quot;Import and Export.&quot;</p>
<p> </div>
</li>
<li>
<div class="stepBg">Step <span>4</span>-&gt; Select &quot;Export to a file&quot; and hit next.  Select &quot;Favorites&quot;  and then hit next.</p>
<p> </div>
</li>
<li>
<div class="stepBg">Step <span>5-&gt;</span> You will see that &quot;Favorites&quot; is now highlight.  Double click  on &quot;Favorites&quot; so the everything below &quot;Favorites&quot; collapses into the  &quot;Favorites&quot; folder and hit next.</p>
<p> </div>
</li>
<li>
<div class="stepBg">Step <span>6</span>-&gt; You will see that the file name is called &quot;bookmark.htm&quot; and  the file location will be &quot;My Documents.&quot;  Click Export and then finish.</p>
<p> </div>
</li>
<li>
<div class="stepBg">Step <span>7</span>-&gt;Copy the file &quot;bookmark.htm&quot; to an external hard drive or flash drive. (You can also upload them to your gmail account)</div>
</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://razor-consulting.net/?feed=rss2&amp;p=159</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mcafee DAT 5958 Fix</title>
		<link>http://razor-consulting.net/?p=156</link>
		<comments>http://razor-consulting.net/?p=156#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razor-consulting.net/?p=156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As many people are already aware, McAfee released DAT 5958 today. This DAT contained a fault, which caused issues in hosts running Windows XP SP3. The fault led to a false detection of the W32/Wecorl.A worm, which was an MS08-067 based worm. This resulted in McAfee nuking svchost.exe killing all win32 services on the machine. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>  As many people are already aware, McAfee released DAT 5958 today. This  DAT contained a fault, which caused issues in hosts running Windows XP  SP3.<span id="more-156"></span> The fault led to a false detection of the W32/Wecorl.A worm, which  was an MS08-067 based worm. This resulted in McAfee nuking svchost.exe  killing all win32 services on the machine. This results in a  laundry&nbsp;list&nbsp;of problems. The way to fix machines impacted by this is  simplistic:</p>
<p> 1. Boot the machine into safe mode</p>
<p> 2. Take the extra.dat file mcafee is providing and load it into  c:\program files\common files\mcafee\engine</p>
<p> 3. Copy svchost.exe from c:\windows\servicepackfiles\i386\svchost.exe to  c:\windows\system32\svchost.exe and  c:\windows\system32\dllcache\svchost.exe</p>
<p> 4. Reboot</p>
<p> This should remove the faulty signature and replace the damaged svchost  from the the servicepack files. This test has been tested and work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://razor-consulting.net/?feed=rss2&amp;p=156</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
